Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs GPT-5.4 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

66.69/100
Margin
5.8pts
← winning
60.89/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.3 Codex #26 (Supported); GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.3 Codex and GPT-5.4 Pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 20 results are unique to GPT-5.3 Codex; 11 to GPT-5.4 Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-5.3 Codex only
20
GPT-5.4 Pro only
11
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-5.3 Codex if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.3 Codex is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 66.69 to 60.89. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.3 Codex. That is roughly 12.9x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.3 Codex.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.3 Codex and GPT-5.4 Pro
CategoryGPT-5.3 CodexΔGPT-5.4 Pro
AgenticGPT-5.3 Codex71.4Margin 17.9GPT-5.4 Pro89.3
CodingGPT-5.3 Codex67.2MarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 ProNot measured
ReasoningGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro83.3
KnowledgeGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro58.7
MathGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro46.9
MultimodalGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro94.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.3 Codex$1.75 input / $14 outputGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputGPT-5.3 Codex has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.3 Codex79 tok/sGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sGPT-5.3 Codex has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.3 Codex88.26 sGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sGPT-5.3 Codex reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.3 Codex400KGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 64.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 86%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 57.47%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 33.7%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 89.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 85%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.2%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 61.77%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 53.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 16.9%30.0%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 44.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 91.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 39.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 9.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 51.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 86.9%Not comparable
HLESource 58.7%Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1193Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 94%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 75.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.3 Codex or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.3 Codex is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 66.69 to 60.89.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.3 Codex or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 71.4. GPT-5.3 Codex stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.