Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
53.65/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1 #94 (Estimated); Mistral Medium 3.5 128B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B share 17 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to GPT-5.1; 8 to Mistral Medium 3.5 128B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
17
GPT-5.1 only
4
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only
8
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.1 is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GPT-5.1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
CategoryGPT-5.1ΔMistral Medium 3.5 128B
CodingGPT-5.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapMistral Medium 3.5 128B77.6
MathGPT-5.126.4MarginNo overlapMistral Medium 3.5 128BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1$1.25 input / $10 outputMistral Medium 3.5 128B$1.5 input / $7.5 outputMistral Medium 3.5 128B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1111 tok/sMistral Medium 3.5 128BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.157.47 sMistral Medium 3.5 128BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1200KMistral Medium 3.5 128B256KMistral Medium 3.5 128B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.0%19.0%GPT-5.1 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 81.9%94.2%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
Gert LabsSource 41.24%39.10%GPT-5.1 leads
GDPval-AASource 24.4%21.4%GPT-5.1 leads
GDPval-AASource 987929GPT-5.1 leads
τ³-bench resultsSource 91.4%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 506Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 33.7%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 69.1%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 14.4%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 33.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 24.61%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.4%46.9%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 43.3%39.6%GPT-5.1 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-LCRSource 75.0%61.0%GPT-5.1 leads
CritPtSource 4.9%0.0%GPT-5.1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 36.9%29.9%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.3%74.8%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-HLESource 26.5%12.8%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 5.6%-36.3%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.6%25.1%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.3%82.0%GPT-5.1 leads
AA Openness IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 31.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 12.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%64.9%GPT-5.1 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1217Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 72.9%68.8%GPT-5.1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B today?

GPT-5.1: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.