Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o vs Sarvam 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
41.49/100
Margin
0.8pts
← winning
40.7/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o #165 (Supported); Sarvam 30B #169 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o and Sarvam 30B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to GPT-4o; 0 to Sarvam 30B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
GPT-4o only
2
Sarvam 30B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o and Sarvam 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4o is priced at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Sarvam 30B. GPT-4o has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 64K for Sarvam 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4o and Sarvam 30B
CategoryGPT-4oΔSarvam 30B
MathGPT-4o0.3MarginNo overlapSarvam 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4oSarvam 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o$2.5 input / $10 outputSarvam 30B$0 input / $0 outputSarvam 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o131 tok/sSarvam 30BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o0.81 sSarvam 30BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o128KSarvam 30B64KGPT-4o lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 25.1%34.5%Sarvam 30B leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 33.3%19.2%GPT-4o leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
CritPtSource 0.0%0.3%Sarvam 30B leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.2%6.6%GPT-4o leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 54.3%63.3%Sarvam 30B leads
AA-HLESource 3.3%7.0%Sarvam 30B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.7%-72.0%GPT-4o leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 19.7%12.7%GPT-4o leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 37.9%97.0%GPT-4o leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.345%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 861Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4oSarvam 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 34.3%26.5%GPT-4o leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o and Sarvam 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o and Sarvam 30B today?

GPT-4o: $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Sarvam 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.