Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Ministral 3 14B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
37.87/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #183 (Supported); Ministral 3 14B #187 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and Ministral 3 14B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 0 to Ministral 3 14B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4o mini only
10
Ministral 3 14B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and Ministral 3 14B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ministral 3 14B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-4o mini is priced at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputMinistral 3 14B$0.2 input / $0.2 outputMinistral 3 14B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o mini33 tok/sMinistral 3 14B110 tok/sMinistral 3 14B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o mini3.16 sMinistral 3 14B0.60 sMinistral 3 14B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o mini128KMinistral 3 14B128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 226Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMinistral 3 14BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o mini and Ministral 3 14B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o mini and Ministral 3 14B today?

GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Ministral 3 14B: $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.