Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.19/100
Margin
6.2pts
winning →
50.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 mini #152 (Estimated); Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 3 share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to GPT-4.1 mini; 0 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-4.1 mini only
6
Mistral Large 3 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4.1 mini is priced at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Large 3. GPT-4.1 mini has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 3
CategoryGPT-4.1 miniΔMistral Large 3
CodingGPT-4.1 mini23.6MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 mini64.2MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
MathGPT-4.1 mini4.5MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 mini88.5MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 mini$0.4 input / $1.6 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 mini80 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sGPT-4.1 mini has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 mini0.76 sMistral Large 31.04 sGPT-4.1 mini reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 mini1MMistral Large 3128KGPT-4.1 mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.7%5.5%Mistral Large 3 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.9%24.6%GPT-4.1 mini leads
GDPval-AASource 0.1%6.6%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 503633Mistral Large 3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 23.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.2%20.1%GPT-4.1 mini leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.4%36.2%GPT-4.1 mini leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
AA-LCRSource 42.3%34.7%GPT-4.1 mini leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
MMLUSource 87.5%Not comparable
GPQASource 64.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.8%15.9%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.4%68.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%4.1%GPT-4.1 mini leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.1%-39.4%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.5%24.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.0%83.7%GPT-4.1 mini leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 4.483%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 58.7%55.7%GPT-4.1 mini leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1027Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMistral Large 3Result
IFEvalSource 88.5%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 38.3%36.2%GPT-4.1 mini leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 3 today?

GPT-4.1 mini: $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-4.1 mini
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.