Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Hy3 Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 18 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

61.16/100
No comparison
N/A
2 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #42 (Supported); Hy3 Preview unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Hy3 Preview share 18 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 4 to Hy3 Preview.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
18
GLM-4.7 only
12
Hy3 Preview only
4
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. GLM-4.7 makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; Hy3 Preview is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 18 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GLM-4.7 and Hy3 Preview finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Hy3 Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.7 and Hy3 Preview
CategoryGLM-4.7ΔHy3 Preview
KnowledgeGLM-4.751.8Margin← 18.0Hy3 Preview33.8
CodingGLM-4.775.4Margin← 17.6Hy3 Preview57.8
AgenticGLM-4.745.7Margin→ 8.7Hy3 Preview54.4
MathGLM-4.71.8MarginNo overlapHy3 PreviewNot measured
Inst. FollowingGLM-4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapHy3 Preview63.1

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GLM-4.7B · Hy3 Preview

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 41%B 54.4%
    Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 13.4
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: GLM-4.7 scored 41%; Hy3 Preview scored 54.4%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.

  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 85.7%B 87.2%
    Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 1.5
    GPQA: GLM-4.7 scored 85.7%; Hy3 Preview scored 87.2%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.

  3. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 24.8%B 25.5%
    Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 0.7
    HLE: GLM-4.7 scored 24.8%; Hy3 Preview scored 25.5%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.

  4. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 73.8%B 74.4%
    Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 0.6
    SWE-bench Verified: GLM-4.7 scored 73.8%; Hy3 Preview scored 74.4%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.7$0 input / $0 outputHy3 Preview$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.782 tok/sHy3 PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.71.10 sHy3 PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.7200KHy3 Preview256KHy3 Preview lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticHy3 Preview wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 41%54.4%Hy3 Preview leads
BrowseCompSource 52%—Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 15.5%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 25.4%30.7%Hy3 Preview leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%—Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 39.95%36.91%GLM-4.7 leads
GDPval-AASource 33.3%35.7%Hy3 Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 11651214Hy3 Preview leads
CodingGLM-4.7 wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.8%74.4%Hy3 Preview leads
LiveCodeBenchSource 84.9%—Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.7%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 45.3%58.8%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-SciCodeSource 45.1%47.6%Hy3 Preview leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 89.4%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —54.4%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —41.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 64.0%66.7%Hy3 Preview leads
CritPtSource 1.7%4.9%Hy3 Preview leads
KnowledgeGLM-4.7 wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
GPQASource 85.7%87.2%Hy3 Preview leads
MMLU-ProSource 84.3%—Not comparable
HLESource 24.8%25.5%Hy3 Preview leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%41.2%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.9%89.7%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-HLESource 25.1%31.6%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -34.6%-18.5%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 29.3%31.5%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.3%73.0%Hy3 Preview leads
GPQA-DSource —87.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
AIME 2025Source 95.7%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 2.439%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1255—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy3 PreviewResult
AA-IFBenchSource 67.9%—Not comparable
IFBenchSource —63.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-4.7 and Hy3 Preview are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.8 versus 33.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.4 versus 57.8. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Hy3 Preview?

Hy3 Preview has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.4 versus 45.7. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Z.AI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.