Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.5

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

68

VS

GPT-5.5

91

2 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · GPT-5.5 #5

Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.5
45.3vs81.5

+36.2 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs58.6

+12.0 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.5
60.6vs66.4

+5.8 difference

Math

GLM-4.7
95.7vs51.7

+44.0 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

GPT-5.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$5 / $30

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.5 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 82%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 82%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.4 versus 60.6. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.5?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 58.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.5?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 95.7 versus 51.7. GPT-5.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 45.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.