Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2

Data verified July 23, 2026

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.

ZA

GLM-4.7-Flash

Z.AI

N/A

No comparison

I

Mercury 2

Inception

N/A

0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7-Flash #106 (Supported); Mercury 2 #105 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7-Flash and Mercury 2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.7-Flash; 0 to Mercury 2.

Updated July 23, 2026

Shared results: 0
GLM-4.7-Flash only: 0
Mercury 2 only: 0
Comparable categories: 0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.7-Flash and Mercury 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GLM-4.7-Flash and Mercury 2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mercury 2 is priced at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7-Flash. GLM-4.7-Flash has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metric	GLM-4.7-Flash	Mercury 2	Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens	GLM-4.7-Flash$0 input / $0 output	Mercury 2$0.25 input / $0.75 output	GLM-4.7-Flash has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per second	GLM-4.7-Flash95 tok/s	Mercury 2789 tok/s	Mercury 2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first token	GLM-4.7-Flash0.91 s	Mercury 23.88 s	GLM-4.7-Flash reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokens	GLM-4.7-Flash200K	Mercury 2128K	GLM-4.7-Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.7-Flash and Mercury 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.7-Flash and Mercury 2 today?

GLM-4.7-Flash: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mercury 2: $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Z.AI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.