Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 (high)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.96/100
Margin
0.6pts
winning →
58.61/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 26B A4B #67 (Supported); GPT-5 (high) #63 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 (high) share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Gemma 4 26B A4B; 4 to GPT-5 (high).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
16
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
4
GPT-5 (high) only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 (high) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5 (high) is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for GPT-5 (high).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 (high)
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BΔGPT-5 (high)
KnowledgeGemma 4 26B A4B43.4MarginNo overlapGPT-5 (high)Not measured
MultimodalGemma 4 26B A4B73.8MarginNo overlapGPT-5 (high)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 26B A4B$0 input / $0 outputGPT-5 (high)$1.25 input / $10 outputGemma 4 26B A4B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableGPT-5 (high)83 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableGPT-5 (high)36.28 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 26B A4B256KGPT-5 (high)128KGemma 4 26B A4B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 11.0%25.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 43.6%84.8%GPT-5 (high) leads
GDPval-AASource 13.1%28.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
GDPval-AASource 7611075GPT-5 (high) leads
JobBenchSource 8.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
AA Coding IndexSource 39.3%37.8%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.0%42.9%GPT-5 (high) leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.09%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
AA-LCRSource 55.7%75.6%GPT-5 (high) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%5.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
MMLU-ProSource 82.6%Not comparable
HLESource 17.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 8.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.7%34.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 79.2%85.4%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-HLESource 18.3%26.5%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -48.1%-8.1%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 18.2%40.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.9%82.1%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
AA MATH-500Source 99.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
MMMU-ProSource 73.8%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.2%74.2%GPT-5 (high) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1214Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5 (high)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 72.4%73.1%GPT-5 (high) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 (high) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5 (high) today?

Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5 (high): $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.