Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
0.5pts
← winning
67.22/100
0 category wins3 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share 17 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 52 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
17
Gemini 3 Pro only
10
Qwen3.7 Plus only
52
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Plus only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3 Pro has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 67.73 versus 67.22. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.7 Plus is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔQwen3.7 Plus
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1Margin→ 60.6Qwen3.7 Plus91.7
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9Margin→ 60.0Qwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1Margin→ 0.4Qwen3.7 Plus81.5
AgenticGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus71.7
CodingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus75.6
KnowledgeGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus60.1
MultilingualGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4
Inst. FollowingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus84.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3 ProB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81.4%B 85.9%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 4.5
    CharXiv: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81.4%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 85.9%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  2. MMMU-Pro

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81%B 79%
    Winner: Gemini 3 ProΔ 2
    MMMU-Pro: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 79%. Gemini 3 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MQwen3.7 Plus1MGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%93%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%—Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.8%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —21.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —936Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%45.5%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —77.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —51.3%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —55.9%Not comparable
ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%65.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%9.1%Tie
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%39.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%90.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%33.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%2.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%22.2%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%25.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%—Not comparable
GPQASource —90.3%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —90.3%Not comparable
HLESource —34.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —88.5%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
MathQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
MultimodalQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%79%Gemini 3 Pro leads
MathVisionSource 86.6%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%85.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%79.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
CharXivSource 81.4%85.9%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
V*Source 88.0%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%80.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.73 to 67.22. The biggest single separator in this matchup is CharXiv, where the scores are 81.4% and 85.9%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 92.9 versus 32.9. Gemini 3 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 31.1. Inside this category, AA-LCR is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 81.1. Inside this category, ScreenSpot Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Google Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.