Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think vs Qwen3.5-27B
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think #41 (Estimated); Qwen3.5-27B #45 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Qwen3.5-27B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think; 27 to Qwen3.5-27B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think only
- 1
- Qwen3.5-27B only
- 27
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 61.31 versus 60.7. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-27B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Δ | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think45.1 | Margin→ 15.5 | Qwen3.5-27B60.6 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5-27B52.0 |
| Coding | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5-27B64.9 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5-27B82.7 |
| Multilingual | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5-27B82.2 |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5-27B95.0 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Qwen3.5-27B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Qwen3.5-27B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Qwen3.5-27BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Qwen3.5-27BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think2M | Qwen3.5-27B262K | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
ReasoningQwen3.5-27B wins4 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Qwen3.5-27B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 65.6% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 85.5% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 33.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 85.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 22.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -42.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 21.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 79.7% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Qwen3.5-27B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 82.2% | Not comparable |
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think or Qwen3.5-27B?
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 61.31 to 60.7.
Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think or Qwen3.5-27B?
Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 45.1. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.