Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think #41 (Estimated); GPT-5.6 Sol #3 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and GPT-5.6 Sol share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think; 45 to GPT-5.6 Sol.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think only
- 1
- GPT-5.6 Sol only
- 45
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and GPT-5.6 Sol is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for GPT-5.6 Sol.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Δ | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 Sol92.0 |
| Coding | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 Sol64.6 |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think45.1 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 SolNot measured |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 Sol94.6 |
| Math | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 Sol87.5 |
| Multimodal | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5.6 Sol83.0 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | GPT-5.6 Sol | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | GPT-5.6 Sol$5 input / $30 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think2M | GPT-5.6 Sol1M | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 91.9% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 92.2% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 62.6% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 84.5% | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | — | 33.7% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 58% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 54.0% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 85.1% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 61.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1736 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1501 | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 56.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 33.0% | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 51.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 65.9% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 88% | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 64.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 91.9% | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | — | 72.7% | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource | — | 60.6% | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | — | 67.2% | Not comparable |
| VulcanBench v3Source | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 77.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 56.1% | Not comparable |
Reasoning5 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 94.6% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 94.6% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | — | 60.5% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 33.1% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 58.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 21.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 58.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 88.8% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 72.7% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and GPT-5.6 Sol on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and GPT-5.6 Sol today?
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think: Pricing unavailable GPT-5.6 Sol: $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.