Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Exaone 4.0 32B vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Exaone 4.0 32B
LG AI Research
40.44/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B #170 (Estimated); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 11 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Exaone 4.0 32B only
13
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
11
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Exaone 4.0 32B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Exaone 4.0 32B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Sakana Fugu-Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensExaone 4.0 32BNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondExaone 4.0 32BNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenExaone 4.0 32BNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensExaone 4.0 32B128KSakana Fugu-Ultra1MSakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 4.1%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-SciCodeSource 25.2%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source —93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource —90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 8.0%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%—Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —93.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MMLU-ProSource 81.8%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.0%—Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 62.8%—Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.9%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.3%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 10.4%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.0%—Not comparable
GPQASource —95.5%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —95.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —50%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AIME 2025Source 85.3%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
CharXivSource —86.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 33.5%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Exaone 4.0 32B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 81.8. Exaone 4.0 32B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

LG AI Research Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.