Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
63
GPT-5.5
91
Verified leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B unranked · GPT-5.5 #5
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Knowledge
+15.4 difference
Math
+33.6 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.5
N/A
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
1M
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
GPT-5.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
GPT-5.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 63.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 66.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 51.7. GPT-5.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.