Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 36 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
72.84/100
1 category wins3 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Max share 36 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max); 22 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
36
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) only
12
Qwen3.7 Max only
22
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) makes more sense if agentic is the priority; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if coding is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 36 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Max finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)ΔQwen3.7 Max
CodingDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)70.9Margin→ 7.0Qwen3.7 Max77.9
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)74.5Margin← 4.8Qwen3.7 Max69.7
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)60.1Margin→ 4.1Qwen3.7 Max64.2
MathDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)95.2Margin→ 1.9Qwen3.7 Max97.1
ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max90.4
MultilingualDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max84.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)B · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 55.4%B 60.6%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 5.2
    SWE-bench Pro: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 55.4%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 60.6%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 37.7%B 41.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 3.7
    HLE: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 37.7%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 41.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  3. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 90.1%B 92.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 2.3
    GPQA: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 90.1%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 92.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  4. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87.5%B 89.6%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 2.1
    MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 87.5%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 89.6%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  5. HMMT Feb 2026

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 95.2%B 97.1%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 1.9
    HMMT Feb 2026: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) scored 95.2%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 97.1%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)$0.435 input / $0.87 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)1MQwen3.7 Max1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 67.9%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
BrowseCompSource 83.4%—Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 48.2%53.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MCP AtlasSource 73.6%76.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GDPval-AASource 13071273DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
ToolathlonSource 51.8%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 36.4%30.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 24.3%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 96.2%94.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
GDPval-AASource 40.4%38.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA BriefcaseSource 932908DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 40.4%45.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Harvey LABSource 84.4%83.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA ITBenchSource 38.3%42.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Tau3 BankingSource 25.8%—Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 46.2%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max leads
aaTerminalBench21Source 64%74.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —64.27%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
CodeforcesSource 3206.0—Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80.6%80.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
SWE-bench ProSource 55.4%60.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SWE MultilingualSource 76.2%78.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 67.9%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 49.93%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 59.4%66.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-SciCodeSource 50.0%48.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —53.5%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MRCR 1MSource 83.5%—Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 62.0%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 66.3%69.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
CritPtSource 12.9%13.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProSource 87.5%89.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SimpleQASource 57.9%—Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 84.4%—Not comparable
GPQASource 90.1%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQA-DSource 90.1%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLESource 37.7%41.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 44.3%46.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.8%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-HLESource 35.9%38.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.0%14.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.3%30.1%DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.0%22.9%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Openness IndexSource 50.0%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
MathQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 95.2%97.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
IMOAnswerBenchSource 89.8%90.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
ApexSource 38.3%44.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Apex ShortlistSource 90.2%—Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12641293Qwen3.7 Max leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 76.5%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or Qwen3.7 Max?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Max are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.2 versus 60.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.9 versus 70.9. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 95.2. Inside this category, Apex is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) or Qwen3.7 Max?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 69.7. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.