Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) vs ZAYA1-8B
Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) #81 (Estimated); ZAYA1-8B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and ZAYA1-8B share 6 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 32 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro (High); 5 to ZAYA1-8B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 6
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) only
- 32
- ZAYA1-8B only
- 5
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) makes more sense if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; ZAYA1-8B is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and ZAYA1-8B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for ZAYA1-8B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | Δ | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)57.0 | Margin→ 16.6 | ZAYA1-8B73.6 |
| Math | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)94.0 | Margin← 13.6 | ZAYA1-8B80.4 |
| Agentic | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)70.6 | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-8BNot measured |
| Coding | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)69.8 | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-8BNot measured |
| Inst. Following | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-8B64.1 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
HMMT Feb 2026
MathA 94.0%B 71.6%Winner: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Δ 22.4HMMT Feb 2026: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) scored 94.0%; ZAYA1-8B scored 71.6%. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 89.1%B 71%Winner: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Δ 18.1GPQA: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) scored 89.1%; ZAYA1-8B scored 71%. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
MMLU-Pro
KnowledgeA 87.1%B 74.2%Winner: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Δ 12.9MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) scored 87.1%; ZAYA1-8B scored 74.2%. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | ZAYA1-8B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)$0.435 input / $0.87 output | ZAYA1-8B$0 input / $0 output | ZAYA1-8B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not available | ZAYA1-8BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not available | ZAYA1-8BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)1M | ZAYA1-8B131K | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | ZAYA1-8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 63.3% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 80.4% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | 44.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 74.2% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 49% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 39.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1299 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 34.4% | — | Not comparable |
| BFCL v4Source | — | 39.2% | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | ZAYA1-8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CodeforcesSource | 2919.0 | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 79.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 54.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 74.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 63.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 46.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 58.7% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 65.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
KnowledgeZAYA1-8B wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | ZAYA1-8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 87.1% | 74.2% | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads |
| SimpleQASource | 46.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Chinese-SimpleQASource | 77.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 89.1% | 71% | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.1% | 71.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads |
| HLESource | 34.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 43.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 33.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -9.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 41.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 88.6% | — | Not comparable |
MathDeepSeek V4 Pro (High) wins5 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) | ZAYA1-8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1264 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) or ZAYA1-8B?
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and ZAYA1-8B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) or ZAYA1-8B?
ZAYA1-8B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 57. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for math, DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) or ZAYA1-8B?
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 80.4. Inside this category, IMOAnswerBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.