Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) vs Hy3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.47/100
Margin
0.2pts
winning →
Tencent
55.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) #81 (Estimated); Hy3 #80 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and Hy3 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro (High); 0 to Hy3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
14
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) only
24
Hy3 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and Hy3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) is priced at $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and Hy3
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)ΔHy3
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)70.6MarginNo overlapHy3Not measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)69.8MarginNo overlapHy3Not measured
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)57.0MarginNo overlapHy3Not measured
MathDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)94.0MarginNo overlapHy3Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)$0.435 input / $0.87 outputHy3$0 input / $0 outputHy3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not availableHy3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not availableHy3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)1MHy3256KDeepSeek V4 Pro (High) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.3%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 80.4%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 44.7%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.2%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 49%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 94.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 39.9%35.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
GDPval-AASource 12991214DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 34.4%30.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
CodeforcesSource 2919.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 79.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.4%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 74.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 46.4%47.6%Hy3 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 58.7%58.8%Hy3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
MRCR 1MSource 83.3%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 56.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 65.0%66.7%Hy3 leads
CritPtSource 10.0%4.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 46.2%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 77.7%Not comparable
GPQASource 89.1%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 89.1%Not comparable
HLESource 34.5%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 43.1%41.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.5%89.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-HLESource 33.5%31.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.7%-18.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.8%31.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 88.6%73.0%Hy3 leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
HMMT Feb 2026Source 94.0%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 88.0%Not comparable
ApexSource 27.4%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 85.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12641229DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Hy3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 71.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and Hy3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) and Hy3 today?

DeepSeek V4 Pro (High): $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens Hy3: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.