Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

58.88/100
No comparison
Soofi Project
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash #61 (Estimated); Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 19 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash; 5 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
3
DeepSeek V4 Flash only
19
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Flash makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Soofi S 30B-A3B is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Soofi S 30B-A3B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryDeepSeek V4 FlashΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash38.8Margin 11.1Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash49.1MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash64.2MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash40.8MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 FlashB · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 83%B 51.4%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 FlashΔ 31.6
    MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 83%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 51.4%. DeepSeek V4 Flash wins this benchmark.
  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 71.2%B 43.4%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 FlashΔ 27.8
    GPQA: DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 71.2%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. DeepSeek V4 Flash wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash$0.14 input / $0.28 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 FlashNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 FlashNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash1MSoofi S 30B-A3B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 49.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 64%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 40.7%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 57.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 54.35%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.1%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 69.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 49.1%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MRCR 1MSource 37.5%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 15.5%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeSoofi S 30B-A3B wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMLU-ProSource 83%51.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
SimpleQASource 23.1%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 71.5%Not comparable
GPQASource 71.2%43.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
GPQA-DSource 71.2%43.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
HLESource 8.1%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 40.8%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 41.9%Not comparable
ApexSource 1.0%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 9.3%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1238Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Soofi S 30B-A3B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Soofi S 30B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.9 versus 38.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.