Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) vs ZAYA1-8B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
Zyphra
N/A
1 category wins1 category wins

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and ZAYA1-8B share 6 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 39 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max); 5 to ZAYA1-8B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
6
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) only
39
ZAYA1-8B only
5
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) makes more sense if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; ZAYA1-8B is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and ZAYA1-8B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for ZAYA1-8B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and ZAYA1-8B
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ΔZAYA1-8B
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)55.3Margin 18.3ZAYA1-8B73.6
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)94.8Margin 14.4ZAYA1-8B80.4
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)63.8MarginNo overlapZAYA1-8BNot measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)68.8MarginNo overlapZAYA1-8BNot measured
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not measuredMarginNo overlapZAYA1-8B64.1

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)B · ZAYA1-8B
  1. HMMT Feb 2026

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 94.8%B 71.6%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Δ 23.2
    HMMT Feb 2026: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) scored 94.8%; ZAYA1-8B scored 71.6%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins this benchmark.
  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 88.1%B 71%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Δ 17.1
    GPQA: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) scored 88.1%; ZAYA1-8B scored 71%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins this benchmark.
  3. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 86.2%B 74.2%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Δ 12
    MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) scored 86.2%; ZAYA1-8B scored 74.2%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)$0.14 input / $0.28 outputZAYA1-8B$0 input / $0 outputZAYA1-8B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)1MZAYA1-8B131KDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.9%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 73.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 45.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 69%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1189Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 47.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 31.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 34.4%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 831Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 39.6%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 81.3%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 31.5%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 22.9%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 35.6%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 39.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
CodeforcesSource 3052.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 79%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 73.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 56.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.9%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
MRCR 1MSource 78.7%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 60.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 63.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 7.1%Not comparable
KnowledgeZAYA1-8B wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
MMLU-ProSource 86.2%74.2%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
SimpleQASource 34.1%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 78.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 88.1%71%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
GPQA-DSource 88.1%71.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
HLESource 34.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 32.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -22.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 95.8%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 50.0%Not comparable
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 94.8%71.6%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
IMOAnswerBenchSource 88.4%59.3%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
ApexSource 33.0%32.2%DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) leads
Apex ShortlistSource 85.7%Not comparable
AIME26Source 89.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1238Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ZAYA1-8BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 79.2%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 85.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 52.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or ZAYA1-8B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and ZAYA1-8B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or ZAYA1-8B?

ZAYA1-8B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 55.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or ZAYA1-8B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.8 versus 80.4. Inside this category, IMOAnswerBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.