Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Base

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Sibling matchup inside the DeepSeek V4 family.

53.95/100
No comparison
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) #92 (Estimated); DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 36 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash (High); 22 to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) only
36
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
22
Comparable categories
1 / 8

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) makes more sense if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile, while DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is the cleaner fit if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base sit in the same DeepSeek V4 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)ΔDeepSeek V4 Pro Base
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)52.1Margin 14.3DeepSeek V4 Pro Base66.4
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)55.3MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)68.5MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot measured
ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro Base51.5
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)91.9MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)B · DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
  1. SimpleQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 28.9%B 55.2%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseΔ 26.3
    SimpleQA: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 28.9%; DeepSeek V4 Pro Base scored 55.2%. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base wins this benchmark.
  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 86.4%B 73.5%
    Winner: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Δ 12.9
    MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 86.4%; DeepSeek V4 Pro Base scored 73.5%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)$0.14 input / $0.28 outputDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not availableDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not availableDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)1MDeepSeek V4 Pro Base1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.6%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 53.5%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 40.3%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 67.4%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 43.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.6%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1147Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
CodeforcesSource 2816.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 78.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.3%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 70.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 52.0%Not comparable
BigCodeBenchSource 59.2%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 76.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
MRCR 1MSource 76.9%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 59.3%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 62.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.4%Not comparable
BBHSource 87.5%Not comparable
DROPSource 88.7%Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 88.0%Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 81.5%Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 85.2%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 51.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Pro Base wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
MMLU-ProSource 86.4%73.5%DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads
SimpleQASource 28.9%55.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro Base leads
Chinese-SimpleQASource 73.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 87.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.4%Not comparable
HLESource 29.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 27.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -22.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 35.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.7%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 83.1%Not comparable
MMLUSource 90.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 90.8%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 90.3%Not comparable
C-EvalSource 93.1%Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.8%Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 51.1%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 53.9%Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 62.6%Not comparable
TriviaQASource 85.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 91.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 85.1%Not comparable
ApexSource 19.1%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 72.1%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 92.6%Not comparable
MATHSource 64.5%Not comparable
CMathSource 90.9%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
MGSMSource 84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1238Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or DeepSeek V4 Pro Base?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base are sibling variants in the DeepSeek V4 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. They are tied on the BenchAlign leaderboard on the current data.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or DeepSeek V4 Pro Base?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.4 versus 52.1. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.