Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3 vs Grok 4.3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
44.97/100
Margin
20.1pts
winning →
65.1/100
2 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3 #147 (Supported); Grok 4.3 #31 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3 and Grok 4.3 share 17 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to DeepSeek V3; 8 to Grok 4.3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
17
DeepSeek V3 only
5
Grok 4.3 only
8
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Grok 4.3 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 65.1 to 44.97. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Grok 4.3's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 47.3 against 38.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 59.1% to 90.1%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Grok 4.3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 2.3x on output cost alone. Grok 4.3 is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Grok 4.3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3 and Grok 4.3
CategoryDeepSeek V3ΔGrok 4.3
KnowledgeDeepSeek V372.7Margin 30.3Grok 4.342.4
CodingDeepSeek V338.9Margin 8.4Grok 4.347.3
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V386.1Margin 4.8Grok 4.381.3
MathDeepSeek V31.7MarginNo overlapGrok 4.3Not measured
MultimodalDeepSeek V3Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.378.1

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V3B · Grok 4.3
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 59.1%B 90.1%
    Winner: Grok 4.3Δ 31
    GPQA: DeepSeek V3 scored 59.1%; Grok 4.3 scored 90.1%. Grok 4.3 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3$0.27 input / $1.1 outputGrok 4.3$1.25 input / $2.5 outputDeepSeek V3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3Not availableGrok 4.3209 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3Not availableGrok 4.312.36 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3128KGrok 4.31MGrok 4.3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.6%24.1%Grok 4.3 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 22.8%97.7%Grok 4.3 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%29.2%Grok 4.3 leads
GDPval-AASource 2171085Grok 4.3 leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 17.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 43.86%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 12.4%Not comparable
CodingGrok 4.3 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
LiveCodeBenchSource 37.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 42%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 23.0%42.3%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 35.4%47.3%Grok 4.3 leads
SciCodeSource 47.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
AA-LCRSource 29.0%64.3%Grok 4.3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%8.0%Grok 4.3 leads
KnowledgeDeepSeek V3 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
GPQASource 59.1%90.1%Grok 4.3 leads
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%37.6%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 55.7%90.1%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-HLESource 3.6%35.0%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.3%18.3%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%34.6%Grok 4.3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%25.0%Grok 4.3 leads
HLESource 35%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.724%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11501225Grok 4.3 leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.1%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V3 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Grok 4.3Result
IFEvalSource 86.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 34.8%81.3%Grok 4.3 leads
IFBenchSource 81.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V3 or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 65.1 to 44.97. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 59.1% and 90.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3 or Grok 4.3?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.7 versus 42.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 47.3 versus 38.9. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, DeepSeek V3 or Grok 4.3?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 86.1 versus 81.3. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
Grok 4.3
API / mo$2,813
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.