Model comparison
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) #65 (Estimated); GPT-5.6 Sol #3 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-5.6 Sol share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking); 46 to GPT-5.6 Sol.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) only
- 2
- GPT-5.6 Sol only
- 46
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-5.6 Sol is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking).
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GPT-5.6 Sol | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)$0.55 input / $2.19 output | GPT-5.6 Sol$5 input / $30 output | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not available | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)Not available | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)128K | GPT-5.6 Sol1M | GPT-5.6 Sol lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 91.9% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 92.2% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 62.6% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 84.5% | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | — | 33.7% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 58% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 54.0% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 85.1% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 61.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1736 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1501 | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 56.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 33.0% | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 51.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 65.9% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 88% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 5.11% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 64.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 91.9% | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | — | 72.7% | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource | — | 60.6% | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | — | 67.2% | Not comparable |
| VulcanBench v3Source | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 77.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 56.1% | Not comparable |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 94.6% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 94.6% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | — | 60.5% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 33.1% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 58.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 21.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 58.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 88.8% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GPT-5.6 Sol | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 72.7% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-5.6 Sol on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GPT-5.6 Sol today?
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking): $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.6 Sol: $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.