Skip to main content

Model comparison

Composer 2 Fast vs GPT-5.4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
OpenAI
74.24/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Composer 2 Fast unranked (Not scored); GPT-5.4 #8 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Composer 2 Fast and GPT-5.4 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Composer 2 Fast; 51 to GPT-5.4.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Composer 2 Fast only
0
GPT-5.4 only
51
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Composer 2 Fast and GPT-5.4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.4 has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 200K for Composer 2 Fast.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Composer 2 Fast and GPT-5.4
CategoryComposer 2 FastΔGPT-5.4
AgenticComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.477.2
CodingComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.457.7
KnowledgeComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.457.6
MathComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.442.5
MultimodalComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.473.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensComposer 2 FastNot availableGPT-5.4$2.5 input / $15 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondComposer 2 FastNot availableGPT-5.474 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenComposer 2 FastNot availableGPT-5.4151.79 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensComposer 2 Fast200KGPT-5.41.05MGPT-5.4 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 75.1%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 79.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 82.7%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 75%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 70.6%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 54.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 60.3%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 73.6%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 41.1%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 33.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 44.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1395Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 64.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 15.3%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 38.9%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 6.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
React Native EvalsSource 94.9%85.3%Composer 2 Fast leads
LiveCodeBench ProSource 87.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 57.7%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 67.42%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 71.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
AA-LCRSource 74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 23.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
GPQASource 92.8%Not comparable
HLESource 52.1%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 39.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 92.8%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 40.1%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 59.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 51.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 41.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 5.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 50.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 88.6%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource 48.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 47.600%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 27.100%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
MMMU-ProSource 81.2%Not comparable
OfficeQA ProSource 53.2%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 82.1%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82.8%Not comparable
ERQASource 65.4%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 61.1%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 85.4%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 41.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 77.1%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1250Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGPT-5.4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 73.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Composer 2 Fast and GPT-5.4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Composer 2 Fast and GPT-5.4 today?

GPT-5.4: $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.