Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

65.32/100
Margin
23.5pts
← winning
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 5 #29 (Estimated); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Large 2 share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 5; 2 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
9
Claude Sonnet 5 only
27
Mistral Large 2 only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Large 2
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5ΔMistral Large 2
AgenticClaude Sonnet 581.9MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
CodingClaude Sonnet 576.7MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
KnowledgeClaude Sonnet 557.4MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
MultimodalClaude Sonnet 588.3MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 5$2 input / $10 outputMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 5Not availableMistral Large 238 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 5Not availableMistral Large 21.45 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 51MMistral Large 2128KClaude Sonnet 5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.4%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 84.7%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 57.4%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 81.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1607Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 46.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 55.4%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1388Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 39.2%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 44.7%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 90.1%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 28.2%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 80.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 30.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 85.2%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 63.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.3%Not comparable
SWE MultimodalSource 28.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.4%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource 42.7%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 61.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 71.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 53.6%29.2%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 70.7%5.3%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
CritPtSource 16.9%0.0%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
HLESource 57.4%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 53.4%9.2%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 91.1%48.6%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
AA-HLESource 39.6%4.0%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.3%-34.0%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.3%20.1%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 37.3%67.8%Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
CharXivSource 88.3%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 77%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1314Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Large 2 today?

Claude Sonnet 5: $2.00 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.