Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Mythos 5 vs MiniMax M2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
83.93/100
Margin
24.4pts
← winning
59.52/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos 5 #1 (Supported); MiniMax M2.5 #55 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Mythos 5 and MiniMax M2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Claude Mythos 5; 1 to MiniMax M2.5.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Mythos 5 only
15
MiniMax M2.5 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Mythos 5 and MiniMax M2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Mythos 5 is priced at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.5. Claude Mythos 5 has the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 128K for MiniMax M2.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Mythos 5$10 input / $50 outputMiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 outputMiniMax M2.5 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Mythos 5Not availableMiniMax M2.546 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Mythos 5Not availableMiniMax M2.52.12 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Mythos 51M+MiniMax M2.5128KClaude Mythos 5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 85%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 88%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 17.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 95.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 80.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88.0%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.85%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
GPQASource 94.1%Not comparable
HLESource 64.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 59%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
USAMO 2026Source 97.6%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
SWE MultilingualSource 92.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5MiniMax M2.5Result
SWE-bench MultimodalSource 54.9%Not comparable
CharXivSource 93.5%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 88.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Mythos 5 and MiniMax M2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Mythos 5 and MiniMax M2.5 today?

Claude Mythos 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.