Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
42.79/100
No comparison
N/A
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet #158 (Supported); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4 Sonnet and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Claude 4 Sonnet; 11 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 4 Sonnet only
16
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
11
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Claude 4 Sonnet makes more sense if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if you need the larger 1M context window or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude 4 Sonnet and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude 4 Sonnet is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Sakana Fugu-Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4 Sonnet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4 Sonnet$3 input / $15 outputSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4 Sonnet40 tok/sSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4 Sonnet1.33 sSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4 Sonnet200KSakana Fugu-Ultra1MSakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 39.66%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 18.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
CodingClaude 4 Sonnet wins
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 37.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 44.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.1%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 93.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 40.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 95.5%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 95.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 50%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1175Not comparable
CharXivSource 86.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 45.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Claude 4 Sonnet or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Claude 4 Sonnet and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Claude 4 Sonnet or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Claude 4 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.7 versus 64.5. Sakana Fugu-Ultra stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.