Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus vs Mistral Small 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

45.88/100
Margin
0.3pts
winning →
46.23/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral Small 4 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 15 to Mistral Small 4.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 4.1 Opus only
3
Mistral Small 4 only
15
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral Small 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Small 4. Mistral Small 4 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral Small 4
CategoryClaude 4.1 OpusΔMistral Small 4
CodingClaude 4.1 Opus74.5MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 outputMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputMistral Small 4 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus29 tok/sMistral Small 4175 tok/sMistral Small 4 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus1.66 sMistral Small 40.64 sMistral Small 4 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus200KMistral Small 4256KMistral Small 4 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
JobBenchSource 21.9%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
AA-LCRSource 44.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 28.2%19.6%Claude 4.1 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1207Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusMistral Small 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral Small 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral Small 4 today?

Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude 4.1 Opus
API / mo$67,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.