Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.2 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Anthropic
41.13/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); GPT-5.2 Pro #23 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 0 to GPT-5.2 Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Opus only
5
GPT-5.2 Pro only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5.2 Pro yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.2 Pro is priced at $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens for Claude 3 Opus. GPT-5.2 Pro has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGPT-5.2 Pro$25 input / $150 outputClaude 3 Opus has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-5.2 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-5.2 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGPT-5.2 Pro400KGPT-5.2 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 ProResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Pro today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.2 Pro: $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.