Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4.1 nano

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
0.9pts
winning →
42.06/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); GPT-4.1 nano #161 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4.1 nano share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 16 to GPT-4.1 nano.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
5
Claude 3 Opus only
0
GPT-4.1 nano only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4.1 nano is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4.1 nano
CategoryClaude 3 OpusΔGPT-4.1 nano
KnowledgeClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano50.3
MathClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano1.0
Inst. FollowingClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano83.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGPT-4.1 nano1MGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 41Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%11.1%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%25.9%GPT-4.1 nano leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%9.6%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%51.2%GPT-4.1 nano leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%3.9%GPT-4.1 nano leads
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4.1 nanoResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4.1 nano on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4.1 nano today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.