Model comparison
Agents-A1 vs Gemma 4 E4B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Agents-A1 unranked (Not scored); Gemma 4 E4B #155 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Agents-A1 and Gemma 4 E4B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to Agents-A1; 14 to Gemma 4 E4B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Agents-A1 only
- 6
- Gemma 4 E4B only
- 14
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Agents-A1 makes more sense if you need the larger 262K context window; Gemma 4 E4B is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Agents-A1 and Gemma 4 E4B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Agents-A1 gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Agents-A1 | Gemma 4 E4B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Agents-A1Not available | Gemma 4 E4B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Agents-A1Not available | Gemma 4 E4BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Agents-A1Not available | Gemma 4 E4BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Agents-A1262K | Gemma 4 E4B128K | Agents-A1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Gemma 4 E4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 24.4% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeGemma 4 E4B wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Gemma 4 E4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 47.6% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 58.6% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 69.4% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 12.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 57.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 3.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -20.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 8.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 31.3% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Gemma 4 E4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Agents-A1 or Gemma 4 E4B?
Agents-A1 and Gemma 4 E4B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Agents-A1 or Gemma 4 E4B?
Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.4 versus 47.6. Agents-A1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.