Skip to main content

Benchmark profile

WeirdML v2 (WeirdML)

A machine-learning engineering benchmark that tests whether LLMs can train models on novel datasets, write PyTorch code, and improve through iterative feedback.

How BenchLM shows WeirdML

BenchLM mirrors the top public WeirdML v2 rows from the official CSV. WeirdML tests whether models can do machine-learning engineering on 17 novel datasets, reporting average accuracy across tasks.

WeirdML is display only on BenchLM because the task is a specialized ML-agent evaluation with iterative feedback and execution constraints. BenchLM stores it as context rather than a weighted model-only benchmark.

25 mirrored top rows130 official CSV rows17 ML tasksOfficial CSVDisplay only

Average accuracy on WeirdML — WeirdML v2

BenchLM mirrors the published average accuracy view for WeirdML. gpt-5.5 (xhigh) leads the public snapshot at 84.91% , followed by gpt-5.5 (high) (83.90%) and claude-opus-4.8 (xhigh) (82.89%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.

25 modelsExternal benchmark mirrorsCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated WeirdML v2

Average accuracy table (25 models)

Score
1
84.91%
2
83.90%
3
82.89%
4
77.95%
6
77.70%
7
76.44%
9
76.04%
10
75.45%
11
72.19%
15
67.15%
19
63.44%
22
60.77%
23
60.70%
24
60.39%
25
60.30%

The published WeirdML snapshot places gpt-5.5 (xhigh) first at 84.91%. The third row is 2.02 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 9.46 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

25 models have been evaluated on WeirdML. The benchmark falls in the External benchmark mirrors category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. WeirdML is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About WeirdML

Year

2026

Tasks

17 novel ML engineering tasks

Format

Average accuracy across tasks

Difficulty

Novel dataset modeling and iterative debugging

WeirdML v2 evaluates models on 17 unusual ML tasks and reports average accuracy across tasks from the official CSV. BenchLM mirrors the top official rows as display-only ML-agent evidence.

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

WeirdML 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

FAQ

What does WeirdML measure?

A machine-learning engineering benchmark that tests whether LLMs can train models on novel datasets, write PyTorch code, and improve through iterative feedback.

Which model leads the published WeirdML snapshot?

gpt-5.5 (xhigh) currently leads the published WeirdML snapshot with 84.91% average accuracy. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on WeirdML?

25 AI models are included in BenchLM's mirrored WeirdML snapshot, based on the public leaderboard captured on WeirdML v2.

Last updated: WeirdML v2 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.