Benchmark profile
We-Math
A multimodal math benchmark for visually grounded mathematical reasoning and answer generation.
Data verifiedHow BenchLM shows We-Math right now
BenchLM is tracking We-Math in the local dataset, but exact-source verification records for these rows are still being attached. To avoid a blank benchmark page, BenchLM shows the current tracked rows below as a display-only reference table.
These tracked rows are useful for inspection and spot-checking, but until exact-source attachments are completed they should not be treated as fully verified public benchmark rows.
Tracked score on We-Math — July 23, 2026
BenchLM mirrors the published tracked score view for We-Math. Qwen3.6 Plus leads the public snapshot at 89.0% , followed by Qwen3.5 397B (87.9%) and Gemini 3 Pro (86.9%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
qwen3-6-plus
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba
qwen3-5-397b
Gemini 3 Pro
gemini-3-pro
Tracked score table (6 models)
ScoreThe published We-Math snapshot places Qwen3.6 Plus first at 89.0%. The third row is 2.1 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 19.0 points, so the table still separates the published systems.
6 models have been evaluated on We-Math. The benchmark falls in the Multimodal & Grounded category. This category carries a 12% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. We-Math is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About We-Math
Year
2026
Tasks
Visually grounded math problems
Format
Multimodal mathematical reasoning
Difficulty
Advanced multimodal mathematics
We-Math is useful as a visual-math stress test because it combines symbolic reasoning with figure understanding. It helps reveal whether a model's math strength transfers into multimodal settings.
BenchLM freshness & provenance
Version
We-Math 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
FAQ
What does We-Math measure?
A multimodal math benchmark for visually grounded mathematical reasoning and answer generation.
Which model leads the published We-Math snapshot?
Qwen3.6 Plus currently leads the published We-Math snapshot with 89.0% tracked score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on We-Math?
6 AI models are included in BenchLM's mirrored We-Math snapshot, based on the public leaderboard captured on July 23, 2026.
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.