Skip to main content

Benchmark profile

Vals MGSM (MGSM)

A multilingual benchmark for mathematical questions.

Data verified

How BenchLM shows MGSM

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI MGSM leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mgsm and updated by Vals on January 9, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.

MGSM is display only on BenchLM. Vals proprietary or Vals-hosted aggregate views are useful context, but BenchLM does not use them as weighted ranking inputs or as a replacement for benchmark-native source records.

75 Vals rows12 task viewspublic datasetTasks: Overall, English, Japanese, Chinese, BengaliDisplay only

MGSM score on MGSM — January 9, 2026

BenchLM mirrors the published mgsm score view for MGSM. Claude Opus 4.5 20251101 Thinking leads the public snapshot at 95.20% , followed by Claude Opus 4.5 (94.76%) and Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Thinking (94.44%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.

75 modelsExternal benchmark mirrorsCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated January 9, 2026

MGSM score table (75 models)

Score
2
94.76%
5
94.22%
6
GPT-5.2OpenAI
94.00%
8
Claude Opus 4Anthropic
93.78%
9
O4 MiniOpenAI
93.42%
11
93.02%
12
GPT-5.1OpenAI
92.98%
14
GPT-5OpenAI
92.84%
15
92.58%
16
92.58%
17
Qwen3 235b A22bFireworks AI
92.47%
19
92.40%
20
DeepSeek R1Fireworks AI
92.25%
22
DeepSeek V3Fireworks AI
92.15%
23
92.15%
24
GPT Oss 120bFireworks AI
92.04%
25
Qwen3 MaxAlibaba
91.82%
26
O3OpenAI
91.75%
27
DeepSeek V3 0324Fireworks AI
91.67%
28
Grok 3SpaceXAI
91.35%
29
O3 MiniOpenAI
91.35%
31
90.95%
32
Grok 4 0709SpaceXAI
90.91%
33
90.87%
34
90.87%
35
DeepSeek V3p2Fireworks
90.87%
37
GLM 4.5Zhipu AI
90.84%
38
GPT-4oOpenAI
90.69%
40
GPT-4oOpenAI
90.36%
42
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
90.15%
45
GLM 4.6Zhipu AI
89.75%
47
89.53%
48
O1OpenAI
89.31%
49
89.31%
50
89.20%
51
89.02%
52
GPT Oss 20bFireworks AI
89.02%
54
GLM 4.7Zhipu AI
88.18%
57
87.85%
58
87.78%
59
GPT-4.1OpenAI
87.67%
61
87.24%
62
86.58%
63
86.25%
64
86.18%
65
Grok 2 1212SpaceXAI
86.15%
66
86.04%
67
85.71%
68
85.42%
69
84.62%
70
84.22%
71
83.96%
72
74.62%
73
71.24%
74
69.27%
75
41.71%

The published MGSM snapshot places Claude Opus 4.5 20251101 Thinking first at 95.20%. The third row is 0.76 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 1.89 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

75 models have been evaluated on MGSM. The benchmark falls in the External benchmark mirrors category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. MGSM is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About MGSM

Year

2026

Tasks

Multilingual grade-school math questions

Format

Accuracy score

Difficulty

Multilingual mathematical reasoning

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI MGSM leaderboard as display-only external evidence. The captured snapshot preserves overall scores, task-level scores where Vals publishes them, uncertainty, latency, and cost-per-test metadata. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted rankings.

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

MGSM 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

FAQ

What does MGSM measure?

A multilingual benchmark for mathematical questions.

Which model leads the published MGSM snapshot?

Claude Opus 4.5 20251101 Thinking currently leads the published MGSM snapshot with 95.20% mgsm score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on MGSM?

75 AI models are included in BenchLM's mirrored MGSM snapshot, based on the public leaderboard captured on January 9, 2026.

Last updated: January 9, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.