Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Holo3-35B-A3B
100
Qwen3.5 397B
63
Verified leaderboard positions: Holo3-35B-A3B unranked · Qwen3.5 397B #19
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 128K context window.
Agentic
+26.4 difference
Holo3-35B-A3B
Qwen3.5 397B
$null / $null
$0.6 / $3.6
N/A
96 t/s
N/A
2.44s
64K
128K
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 128K context window.
Holo3-35B-A3B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Holo3-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 82.6 against 56.2.
Qwen3.5 397B gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Holo3-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 63.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 56.2. Qwen3.5 397B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.