Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5.1

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

68

VS

GLM-5.1

82

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · GLM-5.1 #25

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.1
45.3vs65.3

+20.0 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs60.9

+9.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-4.7
60.6vs52.3

+8.3 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

GLM-5.1

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$1.4 / $4.4

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

203K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GLM-5.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.3 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 24.8% to 52.3%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GLM-5.1 gives you the larger context window at 203K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 24.8% and 52.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or GLM-5.1?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 52.3. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or GLM-5.1?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 60.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.3 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-4.7
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.