Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude 4.1 Opus
51
MiniMax M2.7
54
Pick MiniMax M2.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4.1 Opus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+20.8 difference
Claude 4.1 Opus
MiniMax M2.7
$15 / $75
$0.3 / $1.2
29 t/s
45 t/s
1.66s
2.53s
200K
200K
Pick MiniMax M2.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4.1 Opus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
MiniMax M2.7 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 54 versus 51. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Claude 4.1 Opus is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That is roughly 62.5x on output cost alone.
MiniMax M2.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 54 to 51.
Claude 4.1 Opus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 53.7. MiniMax M2.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.